1 day
Launch
$6,500
Best for: Five attorneys or fewer
Services
RPC 5.3, and because staff touch the files first.
Public tools are the wrong place for New Jersey client files.
I come to the office, stand up a private environment on the systems you already have, and train the people who touch the files.
I am a New Jersey lawyer in Farmingdale. I built this environment for my own confidential files. I work on-site within about 90 minutes of Monmouth County.
Solo, nonprofit, founding-client, and diverse-team rates are on the Platform page.
Packages
These prices are for firms of five attorneys or fewer. For larger firms, prices change as needed and are quoted.
1 day
$6,500
Best for: Five attorneys or fewer
2 days
$12,500
Best for: Five attorneys or fewer
3 days over 3–4 weeks
$19,500
Best for: Larger firms, quoted
Consulting is not the Viro subscription. You can buy the day without the platform. You cannot treat the platform as a substitute for the day. You do not have to buy Viro. Viro is what I train on. I can also train on public AI tools; those will not be as confidential. The subscription starts at $2,000 a month. It increases with attorney count and whether an individualized app is needed.
Launch day
This is the Launch-day sequence. Practice Install and Firm System add days. The core does not change.
01
Account structure, retention, and no-training settings. The point is a contained place to work, not a public consumer login.
02
Folders by practice area and matter type, on the systems the office already has.
03
8–12 prompts saved and tested on the firm’s redacted sample files.
04
Lawyers work in the environment on sample files. They leave knowing what belongs in it, what stays out of public tools, and how to treat output as draft work. Judgment stays with the lawyer.
05
For PI firms this orbits medical-records chronology: records, indexing, a timeline, inconsistency flags, and lawyer review. It is not generic file management. Paralegals and intake staff often touch the file first. RPC 5.3 is why they sit in the room.
06
A one-page AI use policy starter and an engagement-letter paragraph the firm can edit.
07
Email support for two weeks after the visit. Longer packages extend that window.
Fit
For
Not for
Ethics
RPC 1.6: confidentiality, and reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized access to client information.
RPC 1.1: competence, including verification of AI output. See also the New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on AI, Preliminary Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence by New Jersey Lawyers (Jan. 24, 2024), collected at njcourts.gov.
RPC 5.1 and RPC 5.3: supervision of lawyers and of nonlawyer staff. That is why training does not stop at the attorneys.
ABA Formal Opinion 512 (July 29, 2024). ABA ethics guidance on generative AI tools.
Lawyer judgment is not delegated.
This engagement is not legal representation of the firm’s clients.
I do not claim this prevents malpractice.
Scope
Process
01
A call or meeting. Fit or no-fit, stated plainly.
02
$2,500. Credited toward a package booked within 45 days.
03
Setup and labs in the office, on the systems you already use.
04
Policy starter and engagement-letter language the firm can actually use.
05
14, 30, or 90 days of support, depending on the package.
06
We meet at least twice a year, and sooner when the tools move. A single training day ages quickly.
Before the visit
How this started
Public tools were useful until a client file needed to go in. Retention toggles on a consumer account were not a system I could stand behind for confidential work. I stood up a private environment on the machines I already used, with folders by matter type, saved prompts, and a rule that the file does not leave the office for a public tool. That is the setup I now bring on-site.
Products
Additional rates, retainers, and the full catalog sit on Platform.
$2,500
Credited toward a package booked within 45 days. The usual first purchase.
$1,500
For firms that already use ChatGPT. Where output is being trusted too far, and where confidential text should not go.
$3,500–$6,000
A structured review of how the firm is using AI on live work. Distinct from the two-hour session.
2-hour $1,500 · Half-day $3,000
A closed session for the partners who will decide tools, policy, and supervision. No staff.
$4,500 remote
Four 75-minute sessions on research, drafting, records, and ethics. Hybrid $6,500.
Standalone lab
Medical records, police records, employee files, chronology, demand-letter first draft, deposition outline, and related PI drafting. Full-day $6,500, or +$3,500 add-on to a sandbox day. Rates also on Platform.
Half-day $3,500 · Written memo $2,500
Compared on the firm’s sample files. The point is not to overbuy a tool the firm does not need.
Half-day $3,000, or $2,000 add-on
How the firm records, describes, and bills time when AI assists the work.
Specialized
I do not invent a public price for this work. Point of contact is Contact or hello@bonnielawconsulting.com.
Quoted
Remote, 2 hours. Someone already pasted records or email into a consumer tool. What to stop, what to document, what to tell the client, and a file memo.
Quoted
Malpractice applications asking how the firm uses AI. A fixed-fee memo.
Quoted
Half-day. D.N.J. GenAI certifications and AEO / confidentiality-order limits. New Jersey-specific.
Quoted
Engagement-letter language and a client FAQ: do not put case facts in ChatGPT.
Quoted
Which tools people actually use. Allow, ban, or replace. Often before Launch.
Quoted
Clio, Filevine, Needles, Smokeball. Wire the sandbox to how PI files already live.
Quoted
A 60-minute recorded staff module and a one-pager. Sold with Stay-on-Call.
Quoted
Medical records, police records, employee files. Vendor export → index → chronology → inconsistency flags → lawyer review.
Quoted
How to use AI to review video and to produce transcripts from video evidence and from audio. Quoted.
FAQ
No. Consulting does not require it. Viro is what I train on. I can also train on public AI tools; those will not be as confidential as the Viro sandbox. The subscription is on the Viro page.
A written assessment, $2,500, credited toward a package booked within 45 days.
Yes. Tool choice depends on the office. I do not promise a particular vendor stack.
Three redacted sample files, the current engagement letter, a list of tools already in use, and who will sit in the labs.
I prefer redacted samples. If the firm later uses the environment on live files, that is the firm’s work. Judgment stays with the lawyer.
Redaction is the firm’s work. I can help choose which files will actually test the workflow. We do not use live, unredacted client files as training material.
On-site is the default. A remote staff lab can be discussed if that group cannot assemble in the room.
On-site work within about 90 minutes of Farmingdale is treated as included. The radius, and anything beyond it, are on the Platform page.
No. This engagement is consulting for the firm. It is not legal representation of the firm’s clients.
That is a stop-the-bleeding session: remote, two hours, quoted. What to stop, what to document, what to tell the client, and a file memo. Write for a specialized package, or start from Contact.
Associates may attend. The base price covers up to eight people. Additional attendees are quoted. Full attendee mechanics are on the Platform page.
The same questions are collected on the FAQ page.
Custom work
If you need an AI solution that is not a Launch, Practice Install, or Firm System day, I will quote a specialized package. I will also tell you when this is not the work. Insurance defense and other practices are custom work.